Uncategorized

How many people believe that 9/11 was an inside job or our goverment knew what was going to happen?


1. The black boxes were never ever found. A few fire fighters were told by the FBI to keep quit about them, otherwise they would lose their jobs and pensions. The black boxes have always been recovered and they can’t be destroyed easy. All four boxes were missing.

2. BBC reported tower 7 5-7 min. before it actually fell. How would they know this tower was going to fall, unless they knew well in advance that it was going to fall.

3. Vice president told his air force to stand down, while the planes flew in the world trade center. The media obviously didn’t report this.

4. The president ignored warnings that 9/11 was going to happen, but yet let it happen. They let 9/11 happen, just like they let Pearl Harbor get hit to enter World War 2.

5. Their was never a proper investigation as to what happen, wasn’t even check for explosives.

This evidence is just the tip of the ice burg.

I don’t believe it. I know it to be fact. Let me prove it with actual news-clips and testimony. Please watch this first video linked here. It’s only one minute. You’re going to be impressed. This is a local news video of a witness named Kenny Johannemann testifying to explosions that happened in the basement of one of the WTC towers. While he is testifying you still see both of the twin towers burning behind him in the background. This was live footage and it’s only ONE minute long. Go ahead and watch this here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEuzU3LMg…

Those explosions were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling the tower. You didn’t see this on TV. Does that prick your interest?

Now look at this. Barry Jennings was another witness that got stuck in Building Seven during 9/11. Building Seven fell later that same day but was NEVER hit by a jet. Watch his account here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbbZE7c3a…

Again, the explosions he talked about were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling down this building. Again, you didn’t see Barry’s testimony on TV.

Here’s some different evidence. Steve Jones, a nuclear physicist, obtained WTC dust samples from the collapsed WTC towers and analyzed it. He reported his detailed findings here in Boston:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=…

Those “red chips” he talked about weren’t the smoking gun they were THE GUN. See the article here:

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Scientists_find_active_superthermite_in_WTC_0404.html

Click here for his actual peer-reviewed paper::

http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

Now get a load of this:

The BBC reported the collapse of the Solomon Building (Building Seven) 20 minutes BEFORE it actually collapsed. Watch that here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlL6ewlW6oc

How did the BBC know in advance that Building Seven would collapse? The fact that it was announced in advance is strong support that the flow of information on this tragedy was being controlled.

Were the people at the BBC the only people privy to this information? Probably not. Larry Silverstein was the leaseholder of Building Seven. In a 2002 PBS documentary he talked about how he discussed the Building Seven situation with the fire department and how the decision was made by that department to &quot:pull&quot: it. Well, there is one problem with his testimony that you may want to consider. It takes about a week to rig a building with explosives before you pull it. So are buildings constructed with built-in explosives just in case they need to be blown up in a hurry? Building Seven went down that same day. Whoops! Watch Larry’s testimony from the PBS documentary here in this short clip:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3E-26oVIIs

Incidentally, luckily for Larry, he insured his property in the nick of time just six months before September 11th! It was a sweet deal. So who orchestrated this terrorist event anyway? They had to get past the FBI and CIA and prepare at least three buildings for demolition as well as direct the activities of men with box cutters (if they even existed). It’s clear from the evidence presented here so far that at least some of the media was in on this. What else could explain the BBC blunder? They had to control the information to those of us who might not like the idea that a few thousand people had to be killed in order to fulfill some kind of agenda. What’s in it for these people that were “in the know?”

Aaron Russo was a famous movie producer who became best friends with one of the Rockefeller family members (Remember “The Rose” and &quot:Trading Places&quot: starring Eddie Murphy?). This is the same Rockefeller family that is a large shareholder of the Federal Reserve Bank — a private company that loans money to our government and contributes to our huge national debt. You see the name “Federal Reserve” at the top the dollar bill. Yes, we’re talking about THAT Bank! Anyway, the upshot of this friendship was that in the year 2000 (11 months before 9/11) Aaron Russo learned from his Rockefeller buddy that there was going to be an &quot:event&quot:. He was told that out of this event the U.S. would go into Afghanistan and look for Bin Laden in Caves and then the U.S. would go into Iraq. His fascinating testimony about this &quot:event&quot: starts at 26:45 here in this interview:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGAaPjqdbgQ

Now see this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw

There is just too much evidence now that suggests an inside job: the fact that ALL THE WRECKAGE WAS SHIPPED ABROAD as soon as possible, the fact that even ROLLS ROYCE themselves have said that the engine recovered at the Pentagon WAS NOT the type of engine used on the type of plane (b757) that was said to be responsible. The fact that some of the ‘hijackers’ are still alive: http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLE… the fact that no jets were scrambled in time: that no significant plane debris was found at the pentagon site (planes do not vaporize!): that the buildings seem to be demolished, especially building 7: that jet fuel cannot melt steel, even though molten steel was seen &quot:flowing like lava&quot:: that the first responders heard explosions in the basement and within the buildings before they collapsed etc…

-WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein admitted that building 7 was pulled down by a controlled demolition: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jPzAakHP… (He changed his story the next day)

-The technology to bring down buildings with thermite and thermate in nano capacity was developed in the 1980’s. They liquidized it in the mid 90’s so it could be painted on like a gel coating. The twin towers underwent ‘maintenance’ for a whole year and guys in white hazmats suits ‘painted’ the core columns.

-Official version claims the towers collapsed due to ‘pancake effect’, meaning the floors came detached from steel girders and fell on top of each other, collapsing the tower. If that’s the case, why weren’t any of the (core column) steel girders left standing? http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ub_6RM9p6nY/Tj…

-Pictures show smoke coming from the basement seconds before the plane hits. People (including firefighters and employees) also heard explosions from below the towers, moments before the plane hit. PEOPLE WERE KILLED AND SOME SERIOUSLY INJURED IN THE BASEMENT.

-Pictures show steel girders with diagonal cuts in the them. This is exactly how controlled demolitions bring down buildings: http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/tts/wtc_ruins_diagonal_cut.jpg

-Designers of the WTC say they were built to withstand MULTIPLE impacts from such an aircraft.

-Official version states the plane that hit the pentagon ‘vaporised’ which is why very little traces can be found. Yet they said they managed to find DNA to identify all of the victims on board. Furthermore the building didn’t ‘vaporise’ in any way. What type of plane vaporises, leaving the building and human DNA relatively undamaged.

-The passport of one of the hijackers in the aircraft was supposedly found in the rubble at the WTC. It’s clearly impossible for any personal effects to survive the impact and explosion, therefore it must have been planted.

-All CCTV footage from around the pentagon has been hidden and never released. Why do that if there is nothing to hide?

-86 CCTV cameras show no airplane???

-Released Pentagon Security Camera (FOIA) does not show a 757 and is clearly Missing a frame.

&quot:WITH ALL THE EVIDENCE READILY AVAILABLE AT THE PENTAGON CRASH SITE, ANY UNBIASED RATIONAL INVESTIGATOR COULD ONLY CONCLUDE THAT A BOEING 757 DID NOT FLY INTO THE PENTAGON&quot:…Colonel George Nelson Aircraft accident investigator U.S. Air Force

Are you for real? An investigation by all those lot? All those who were responsible, haha! If you think that you’re so right about this, what have you got to say about the taxi driver who was driving the cab near the pentagon and had a street light lodged in his windscreen, you know the same cab driver who admitted that he’d been drafted into the plan to make it look like a plane had clipped the street light. You people who don’t want to believe your government would do something like this are so very gullible. Do you know, this is the very same reason why the Jew’s were killed in nazi camps. How was it possible for just a passing citizen who was filmed and interviewed by a news station just minutes after the planes hit the towers, but to be using words like ground zero and terrorism? He used all the important key words (brain washing) like as if he’d been briefed and guess what right next to him is an agent, who on being asked what his roll is he refused to say. OPEN YOUR EYE’S!!! It’s not too late.

I’m so tired of this crap. Russell, those &quot:facts&quot: of yours are utter BS.

1) Black boxes are not indestructible. Ordinary crash scenarios do not involve stationary buildings, massive fires and a being crushed by a gazillion tons of debris. FBI silenced the NYFD? Cite a credible news source, not some BS video on YouTube.

2) BBC reported tower 7 down before it happened? Again, BS. How can you prove that beyond some other wack job’s posting on youTube? You can’t.

3) The Vice President is not the Commander in Chief while the President is available. The FAA made the decision to ground ALL aircraft until we could sort this out.. Fighters WERE scrambled to help round up stragglers. Total BS again.

4) Ignored what warnings? The one’s that vaguely stated an attack is imminent? There were no specifics to act on.

5) And this was the best one – Never an investigation?!?!? Are you truly that stupid?? This investigation involved the FBI, CIA, NYPD, NSA and probably even the Boy Scouts!

You completely lack critical thinking skills and absorb all of the scum the internet &quot:theorists&quot: can shovel into your open skull. Please adjust your medication.

Well, if you count that one time where the US trained Osama Bin Laden and created the group that would later be called Al Qaeda and used them to get the Soviets out of the picture so the US could control the middle east… then yes… 9/11 could technically be considered an inside job regardless of any of the other theories.. 9/11 should have been a wake up call that our government and our foreign policy is out of control, but instead the majority just accepted the official story and I fear the victims may have died in vain.

This topic is no longer up for debate. As soon as one gathers ALL of the available evidence, you can no longer believe the governments official conspiracy theory. The evidence is much too overwhelming and would certainly incriminate certain members of the United States. The events of September 11th were planned and carried out internally to perpetuate a never ending war that would allow the government to strip US citizens of their rights and to establish a PERMANENT base in the Middle East in order to control natural resources. This should be obvious by now (we are still over there!).

You, and many others believe this to be true, but think of it this way. Even with overwhelming evidence that the Bush White House knew about the attack, even helped it happen, do you think for a second that any person at that level of government would ever admit to it? Imagine if they did, what would that do to the social fabric of the nation? The US government has tracked down and killed or imprisoned every person of notoriety since it’s inception, yet they came up with nothing when President Kennedy was killed. Lee Harvey Oswald? BS! Americans in general, are a credulous bunch who will believe whatever they are fed by the corrupt mainstream media, just keep them distracted by the Hollywood crowd, fast food, football, baseball and NASCAR and presto, you’ve got a slumbering populous that still believes American elections are fair and unbiased.

Benjamin Franklin was apprehensive about allowing certain wealthy groups to gain a foothold in the American economic development and he was correct in his assumption that this particular group would eventually erode the ‘ultimate’ freedom of the people. The living proof of his concerns can be seen today in the existence of the Federal Reserve, which is run by the same group that has interfered in American politics since the 1700’s. Only a civil war or a natural disaster of epic proportions will shake these parasites from their nesting sites.

Considering the fact that there are many events on 9/11/2001
that if the official explanation is accepted, VIOLATE THE LAWS OF PHYSICS.

Therefore, WE THE PEOPLE have paid our tax dollars to publish FRAUD
in the form of the &quot:reports&quot: on various aspects of the attack &amp: collapse of
WTC 1,2 &amp: 7 ( not to mention the entire PENTAGON fiasco )

WAKE UP AMERICA
its later than U think!

The way to keep something like government involvement in 911 a secret is to tell the participants only what they need to know. Very few people knew about the whole plan for the attacks on 911. And if someone were to come forward with only what they knew, it wouldn’t be enough to prove a conspiracy.

Remember, we have the best government money can buy.

Let us address this point by point.

1. Not true. The FDR for Flight 77 and the FDR and CVR for Flight 93 were both recovered with usable data. The Recorders for Flights 11 and 175 were crushed and pulverized under tens of millions of tons of concrete and steel – something for which they were not designed to withstand. You might be suprised BTW how often the supposedely indestructible &quot:black box&quot: does not survive an air crash. Besides, the presence of the 11 and 175 boxes might fill in a few details but otherwise does not change the conclusion of what happened. We know the flights were hijacked, we know who did it, how and why and the flights were positively tracked by multiple radar stations from take-off to impact.

2. Yes the BBC reported about 20 minutes (not 5-7) before 7 World Trade Center collapsed that it had collapsed.

So what? I mean that quite sincerely. So what? The first news I heard that morning was a small private Cessna had crashed into the World Trade Center. I also very clearly recall reports of truck bombs going off at the Capitol and the Thomas Jefferson buildings in DC. Those like hundreds of other reports in the chaos and confusion of that day were WRONG, as initial reports in an emerging crisis situation often are. The BBC wasn’t even the first news organization to report the collapse of 7. Rueters had reported it right after 1 WTC fell, then retraced it. CBS and NBC also reported it in the afternoon long before 7 went down. So why pick on the BBC? I know why. Because Dylan Avery and his buddies in all their careful research on 9/11 failed to notice these other reports and only included the BBC report in their silly movie.

And what are you trying to say here, that the Evil Doers concocted a super-secret, foolproof plan to blow up 7 World Trade using uber-silent explosives that don’t explode, then decided to issue press releases ahed of time?!?!?! To what purpose? What could possibly be served by this? Did they think the media would not notice the collapse of a 47-story building? The mind boggles!

3. Stand down order? Really? You want to go there? Hey, 2006 is calling. They want their long discredited nonsense back. Seriously, nobody uses this tired old meme anymore. I won’t even spend anymore space on it.

4. I assume you are referring to the August 6th Presidential Daily Brief that included a section entitled &quot:Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States&quot:.

How many people making this claim have actually read this memo, which they so carefully cherry-picked out of the thousands of conflicting memo’s recieved on this subject by the Bush administration? Probably none. For your entertainment a link to the memo is listed below:

Now that you are done reading it can you tell me what information contained within you would have used to arrest the 9/11 hijackers and stop the event from happening? Supposing the Bush admin had taken terrorism seriously (I think it’s pretty obvious that they did not). What is it that people think they could have done to prevent the attacks with the vague and non-specific warnings like this they were receiving? Should they have rounded up all young males of Middle-Eastern origin who were attending flight schools in the US and deported them immediately? Locked down air travel entirely? Water-boarded Moussaoui until he spilled the beans on what he knew?

5. 9/11 is in fact the most investigated criminal act in all of human history. At one point or another every single agency of the federal government including 50% of all FBI agents were involved as well as hundreds of civilian agencies, universities and experts. I would imagine the number of investigators is well into the tens of thousands, perhaps over 100,000. So on what basis do you make this claim?

Operation Northwoods: Another item from Dylan Avery’s terrible movie he now regrets including, if anything Northwoods proves the government WOULD NOT DO 9/11. Think about it – here we have a plan that involved acts of petty vandalism in which no one would be hurt and which could be blamed on a very clearly defined adversary and yet it was REJECTED OUT OF HAND and resigned to a dustbin deep in some government archive. While Northwoods has nothing to do with 9/11 – there is no link of any kind between them – it would seem to show the opposite of what you are trying to prove.

So then, where then is the rest of this iceberg? You are going to need it. More importantly, what are you doing about it other than getting all shouty in an obscure internet Q&amp:A forum where nothing you say will make any difference to anyone. If you have important evidence concerning the greatest crime in all of human history why are you not presenting it to DSM’s legal defense team? Why are you not trying to set an innocent man free? What is stopping you from doing anything productive?

what do u mean no one has came out the closet? theres been several ex CIA agents that came out and exposed the governments involvement on 9/11. and why would any news station expose the conspiracy if they were also involved. we know the government have ties with the mainstream media. they use the media to control our beliefs. nothing in the official stoty checks out. it was all set up to justify invading the middle east.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *