Uncategorized

At what point does the 9/11 conspiracy &quot:theory&quot: become 9/11 conspiracy FACT?


Because the questions everyone is asking is why were we not told the WHOLE truth and why was there an obvious attempt at a treasonous COVER UP?

When one of two things happen: an overwhelming majority of people believe in the conspiracy, or evidence proves it.

A simple reason why all details are not disclosed is because they are matters of national security, and if you think that’s a joke, dig around for about 50 years back of declassified national security secrets and determine if the population then would have been ready to hear what was going on, or if it would have been wise of the government to disclose that information.

There is an equally contentious (as to its method of operation) theory of gravity too, and thermodynamics, etc, etc. They may never be proved, that is a fact, they might is a theory. For the undeniable parts of 9/11 theory to be proved would for a start require their contemplation as legitimate by the US government who organised it with the purpose of controlling the oil market, eventually. The majority of the people will decide what they believe in time, the question is how much time. It took 200 years to see that white men in essence stole America from Red men (rather than liberated it) and another 100 for a general consensus on the slavery of black men being wrong, only theories then.

9/11

Despite forensics, physics, anomalies, cover-ups, circumstances, impossible feats of 9/11, people have it in their minds that the &quot:government won’t do that&quot: or &quot:try to cover it up&quot: and then the whole investigation ends there. There’s no attempt to go further and becomes dismissed.

That’s not how crimminal justice works. But I guess they’ll let 9/11 slide for the convenience of expanding an empire. But wouldn’t it also put other people at risk of another incident happening probably on a more massive scale?

When you find proof that there is a conspircy, thus no longer making it a theory.

How do you do this? There were four reporters that commited &quot:suicide&quot:. The chances of this happening are about 1 in 4,000,000,000,000,000,000 or more. All of them were researching the Bush family. Personally, I think there is more to it than just the Bush family, which is why they were murdered.

The four reporters were Danny Casalaro in 1991, Mark Lombardi in 2000, J.H. Hatfield in July 2001, and Gary Webb 2004

Out of all the reporters, the most interesting is Mark Lombardi due to his artistic abilities to simplify everything into a visual diagram that the common person could understand. He was about to become famous due to his new form of art, yet he decided to commit *suicide*.

If you want to find out how deep the rabbit hole goes, then finish Mark Lombardi’s work. Personally, I wouldn’t touch it with a ten-foot pole.

Edit:

&quot:at what point does questioning the official account and/or pointing out suppressed or officially omitted facts become a &quot:conspiracy theory&quot: in the first place? in any criminal investigating any party destroying or suppressing evidence has to be regarded as suspect.how does pointing this out make an investigator a &quot:theorist&quot:? the tag in itself is ridiculous.&quot:

Because the individual doesn’t have proof, thus its a theory. The man who said the world was round was considered crazy until he had proof. Essentially, prior to proof it was considered a theory, which he was considered crazy because it defied everyone’s beliefs.

Edit 2:

&quot:why is it that it’s the facts that don’t back up the official account which get thrown out&quot:

Thats why one theorizes that there is a conspiracy, thus creating a conspiracy theory. There shouldn’t be a stigma against conspiracy theorist, yet there is for some odd reason. Ironically, government think-tanks theorize probabilities and possibilities, which they are taken as fact.

at what point does questioning the official account and/or pointing out suppressed or officially omitted facts become a &quot:conspiracy theory&quot: in the first place? in any criminal investigation any party destroying or suppressing evidence has to be regarded as suspect.how does pointing this out make an investigator a &quot:theorist&quot:? the tag in itself is ridiculous.

why is it that it’s the facts that don’t back up the official account which get thrown out? and as well as highly suspicious behavior, isn’t destruction evidence in itself a criminal offense? and are those who , when provided with evidence, refuse to acknowledge this, complicit morally if not legally?

edit: Arcanum Noctis: &quot:Because the individual doesn’t have proof, thus its a theory. The man who said the world was round was considered crazy until he had proof. Essentially, prior to proof it was considered a theory, which he was considered crazy because it defied everyone’s beliefs.&quot:

but there incidentally is proof of facts being suppressed in relation to the events of 9/11. nonetheless the point is that it is part of the everyday deductive nature of crime solving – not some crackpot notions as the official version defenders try to insinuate.

edit2: Arcanum Noctis &quot:Thats why one theorizes that there is a conspiracy, thus creating a conspiracy theory. There shouldn’t be a stigma against conspiracy theorist, yet there is for some odd reason. Ironically, government think-tanks theorize probabilities and possibilities, which they are taken as fact&quot: .

I think one actually concludes in this context. The conspiracy is against those who question 9/11 -not conspiracy theorists per se -who would properly include every crime investigator in the world going about his everyday job.
The use of CT as a tag is in itself a psy-op and one which works with many .

When the American people finally decide to add 2 and 2 and get 4 instead of 5.

And the sheep probably still won’t believe their government could do that to them.

BAAAAHHH.

I used to be a sheep. Then I found this site, and it cleared up a lot of the questions I had about 9/11…

http://www.wanttoknow.info/9-11cover-up1…

You’ll notice that this isn’t &quot:Loose Change&quot:. It’s excerpts from (supposedly) credible, main stream media sources, and it includes links to the actual articles.

Some people still look at it and think, &quot:My government wouldn’t do that.&quot:

It’s so funny to me… people get their news from the state-controlled media outlets, and they bash the &quot:alternative media&quot: for bringing out points of view you don’t find in the main stream… but when those same main stream media outlets point to corruption and deceit from our own government, they don’t believe it.

People are so dumb.

Looks like Kel nailed this one down… Parts 9 &amp: 10 at this Link are real special. &gt: &gt: http://nz.youtube.com/watch?v=Ekg_p1gCtW…

Because the Zionists who were behind it all never allow facts that point to their guilt become public in in their heavily infiltrated truth movements.

http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfo…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Yd53Xs6h…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Of4xsYl6U…

nice analysis as to how the flight data recorder from flight 77 was either doctored or a complete lie –&gt:

it’s a truly frightening time we live in

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *